Spain: Stephen Dixon discusses ‘vaccine passports’
When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters.Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer.Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights.You can unsubscribe at any time.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson gave his biggest hint to date that vaccination passports will “definitely” be needed for travel in the future when speaking during a visit to Middlesborough. It comes as discussions are ongoing about trialling similar inoculation documents at certain events across the UK such as at stadiums or in pubs.
However, there are some major concerns on the ethics of such documents carrying personal health data.
Express readers shared their insights into the ongoing debate, with some rallying against the passports, claiming they were “taking away our freedoms”.
One reader said: “That is for each individual country to decide, we are talking about a British Prime Minister telling British citizens they can’t travel without a vaccine passport.
“How easy it is to take away your freedom and you applaud the move.”
A second commenter also shared the belief such passports would be “taking away our freedom”.
Others pointed to the ethical responsibility the Government is expected to uphold across the country.
“Unethical, illegal and will fail in this country,” wrote a reader.
“It doesn’t stop you getting or transmitting the virus.”
Spain holidays: Tourists must wear face masks on the beach [INSIGHT]
Summer holidays ‘set for Covid traffic lights’ [COMMENT]
Vaccine passports ‘definitely’ needed says Boris Johnson [UPDATE]
Indeed, this is a concern shared by Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother watchdog.
Speaking on Sky News, she said: “I think this is a really really troubling idea. It is unnecessary. We have got a fantastic vaccination programme, we should be coming out of this crisis. It is unworkable and it is unBritish.
“We are not a nation that lives on license. We are not a nation that carries ID cards and frankly the idea of carrying Covid passes, which is like an ID card on steroids, immediately would carry very sensitive health data, to try to implement a segregation policy.
“We haven’t seen anything like this in Britons for decades. This is very troubling. This should be a time for optimism, instead, I think we find outlives on the precipice of a serious civil liberties war.”
A few commenters remained firm on the stance they would not be partaking in the new scheme.
“No jab no flight it’s very simple! Stick to Blackpool,” said one holidaymaker.
A second added: “My body, my choice, try this one and I will sue them.”
However, plenty of people seem in support of the vaccine passport scheme – at least when it comes to overseas travel.
“In the good old days of foreign travel, we all used to go to British Airways in Regent Street, London,” wrote one reader.
“We paid for and received the jabs required for the chosen destination – Typhoid, Tetanus, Gamma Globulin etc. etc.
“After we received these jabs, we were given a little book, stamped, signed and dated that we took with us wherever we travelled.
“Perhaps it’s the term ‘vaccine passport’ that’s freaking out all these oversensitive objectors. So why not refer to it as ‘A Personal Vaccination Log’ ?”
Another was in support of vaccine passports for travel, but admitted holidays should remain on hold for “some time”.
“A vaccine passport of some sort is absolutely required,” they wrote.
“If we do not have one then other countries both in the EU or out of the EU not will want you to have one, to keep their citizens safe. It will not just be the U.K. who has something like a passport.
“Having said that Boris should not be thinking of allowing holidays abroad for some time until we can see that we have the Pandemic under control.”
Source: Read Full Article